![snapz pro x for windows 7 snapz pro x for windows 7](https://mac-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Parallels-Desktop_29.jpg)
- #SNAPZ PRO X FOR WINDOWS 7 SOFTWARE#
- #SNAPZ PRO X FOR WINDOWS 7 PROFESSIONAL#
- #SNAPZ PRO X FOR WINDOWS 7 SERIES#
The main idea behind it: use the PRIMARY STORYLINE for A-Roll, and the subsequent clips would serve as B-Roll. It may become frustrating trying to juggle all the clips back to their intended spots. Since the subsequent clips are magnetically attached to the PRIMARY STORYLINE, they will move with the PRIMARY STORYLINE. The problem increases when you are trying to keep the subsequent clips (above or below the PRIMARY STORYLINE). This, in turn, would modify the length of the overall project.
#SNAPZ PRO X FOR WINDOWS 7 SERIES#
Once you move a series of clips into the PRIMARY STORYLINE (shortcut W ), every time you’d change the length of any of those clips, all other clips would SNAP to the last frame of the affected clip. In FCPX, we have been tutored to add the clip to the PRIMARY STORYLINE, which is (for the FCPX beginners) that dark grey block in the middle of the project.
![snapz pro x for windows 7 snapz pro x for windows 7](https://mac-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/1AppMode_1.jpg)
FCP7’s strength was that all clips could be independent of each other. If we had to move all the clips in, let’s say V2 and V3, without affecting track V1, we put a lock on track V1, selected all clips, move them to a new position, and voilá. If I had to move a clip on any of those tracks, we just selected the clip(s), and moved them, without affecting other clips on any of those tracks. Video tracks corresponded with audio tracks. In FCP 7, we could drag our clips to tracks V1, V2, V3, while the audio would go to A1, A2, A3 accordingly. However, the biggest issue was the magnetic PRIMARY STORYLINE. At first, a lot of features did not go over well with me – the layout was all wrong, the CAPTURE SCRATCH folder organization was off, and why on earth did we go from editing a project’s sequence to editing an event’s project ? After about 2 years, I decided to give FCPX another try.
![snapz pro x for windows 7 snapz pro x for windows 7](https://mac-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Hardware-Monitor_7.jpg)
I was holding on to FCP 7 for as long as I could until I made the switch to Premiere. FCPX 10.1 did nothing to engage my interest. Initial Frustrations with Final Cut Pro XĪ few years ago, I was terrified to approach FCPX, as I was much accustomed to the layout of FCP 7, which is more similar to Premiere than to its own upgrade.
#SNAPZ PRO X FOR WINDOWS 7 SOFTWARE#
But when I am a sole editor and the choice of software is mine, I go with FCPX. If I need to work with multiple editors accustomed to Premiere, then I switch to Premiere to accommodate their workflow. My response – “Which software would you like me to use?” Most of the time, the response is indeed a rhetorical question, as I’d prefer to use a software that best fits the job. In my editing career, I’ve been bombarded with clients’ questions about which software I use. A lot of decisions are made based on what operating system you’re using and its specifications, the type of capture media and codecs, post-basic editing needs, deadline, etc. Most professionals acknowledge that there is no one definitive tool to rule all projects.
#SNAPZ PRO X FOR WINDOWS 7 PROFESSIONAL#
Before reading this article, I’d like to point out that I’m a fan of most professional NLE software (Avid, Premiere, DaVinci, FCPX).